Paradigm loudspeakers and the words "high value" seem to go hand in hand -- likely the result of the company carving out an enviable niche in the audio world by designing, manufacturing, and selling relatively inexpensive speakers that offer quite an extraordinary level of performance. I know -- Ive reviewed a good number of Paradigm speakers -- from the entry-level Atom, to the mid-level Monitor 5, to the cutting-edge Reference Active/40, and most recently the Reference Studio 20 v.3, which is amazingly good-sounding and retails for just $800 USD per pair.
But while everyone wants value, not everyone wants a budget-priced loudspeaker. As a result, there has been, for as long as Ive been reviewing speakers, a segment of the audio market clamoring for something more from Paradigm -- as in more ambitious and more expensive. Enter Paradigms newest line, Signature, the companys response to those audiophiles who have been waiting for Paradigm to pull out the stops.
According to Scott Bagby, Paradigms head of research and development as well as company co-owner, Signature represents an "all-out engineering effort" for Paradigm. Every part of every Signature speaker was designed specifically for the series. The results are the top-of-the-line S8, priced from $5400 to $6000 per pair depending on finish; the middle-range S4, which costs from $2600-$3000, again depending on finish; and the subject of this review, the S2, which ranges in price from $1900 to $2200. For people who want to complete a home-theater system, there are two Signature center-channel models (C3 and C5), one surround model (ADP), and one hefty new subwoofer (the Signature Servo), which has a 1200W amp that is said to put out 4500W (!) peaks.
I praised the Studio 20 v.3 for having a "flashier, more dramatic look" than previous Paradigm speakers. In fact, until the S2 arrived, the new Studio 20 v.3 was the spiffiest-looking Paradigm speaker Id seen -- a long haul from the more basic boxes the company had been producing since the 80s. The S2, though, isnt just good looking for a Paradigm speaker; it's good-looking, period.
Still, the new Signature appearance doesn't represent a radical departure from the look of Paradigm's other speakers. With its tweeter/woofer "keyhole" design, the S2 has Paradigm written all over it, and its drivers look quite similar to those of the Studio-series speakers. But Signature has rounded side and top panels, which I dont think any Paradigm speaker has had, along with an absolutely gorgeous real-wood veneer. For $1900 you get the S2 in cherry, which looks good but isnt as attractive as the Signature high-gloss finishes. For what I think is a well-spent $300 you can get what the review pair came in: heavily lacquered bird's-eye maple. Such a sight -- and for such a price! I praised the two Focus Audio speakers I reviewed for their stunning woodwork, and I can say that Paradigm Signatures high-gloss finish is their equal. High-gloss rosewood and piano black are said to be coming soon.
Paradigm designs its speakers to be used with the grilles on (which is how I listened), but I suspect most will take them off at least a few times to see whats underneath. According to Paradigm, Signature is far more than Studio in fancy cabinets.
Take the tweeter, for example: the aluminum dome has been gold-anodized for Signature, something Paradigm says increases the drivers rigidity without adding mass. The bass-midrange unit uses the same Mica-Loaded Polymer cone technology used in Studio, but Paradigm has worked on all aspects of the driver -- from the cone, to the basket, to the magnet structure -- to take it to the highest level possible. There are many other refinements -- too numerous to mention briefly in this review -- so I suggest that to learn about them all you visit Paradigm's website or obtain a brochure, which describes the Signature line quite well.
Spec-wise, the S2s sensitivity in an anechoic chamber is rated as 88dB, impedance is said to be "compatible with 8 ohms," and recommended power handling ranges from 15-225 watts. The S2 uses a "3rd-order electro-acoustic" crossover, and the designers have managed to inch the S2s crossover point down to 1.8kHz versus the 20 v.3s 2kHz. Each S2 weighs 28 pounds, and on the backside are attractive and durable binding posts suitable for biwiring and biamping.
But the spec sheet says only so much. Other than the high power handling (225 watts is very high for a two-way monitor), theres not much there that would differentiate the S2 from Paradigms other less costly speakers, or some other companies speakers for that matter. But theres much more to Signature than specifications.
The S2s took the same position atop 24"-high stands in the same system in which the Studio 20 v.3s were reviewed: Zanden Model 600 integrated amplifier, Stello DA220 DAC (as well as the Zanden Model 5000 Mk IV DAC for a time), Theta Data Basic transport dejittered by an Assemblage D2D-1, Nordost Valkyrja speaker cables and interconnects, and i2Digital and DH Labs digital cables.
Setup was simple: I left a few feet to each side wall, a clear five feet behind, and toed the S2s in about 10 degrees. Presto! Perfect center fill and wonderfully balanced sound throughout my room.
After a terrific start, the rest of the review didnt get going as easily as it could have. At first, I had trouble writing about the S2s sound -- or lack of sound, really. The easiest components to write about are the ones with the most colorations. For example, if a speaker has a prominent midrange, thats a snap to describe. Perhaps the bass is boomy or the treble bright, or maybe the speaker does something else out of the norm. Again, that stuff is easy to put on paper. Whats more, those aspects are oftentimes what give certain components their "character," and if a reviewer isnt careful, that character -- or more accurately, coloration -- can be construed as being a good thing when its really not, at least if your goal is to reproduce music with high fidelity. But when a component does so little wrong, as the S2 does, you end up fixating only on the music and not the product -- exactly what you want in a piece of audio gear. But this makes for difficult writing.
And thats exactly what the S2s wrought in my room. Save for the extreme low bass (below 40Hz or so), which no smallish speaker reproduces, the S2s sound as flawless as any two-way speakers Ive heard. Clean, clear, and completely uncongested, the S2s draw absolutely no attention to themselves. In fact, I found myself enjoying far too much music with them and taking far too few notes.
Take a day late last month, for example, when I was helping our editors format articles for publication. I was wiped out from staring at my computer screen all day, so I retreated to listen to the 2003 remaster of Willie Nelsons 1982 release, Always on My Mind [Columbia/Legacy CK 89257]. With pen and paper in hand I put the disc into my transport and let it play. When the 12 tracks finished, I was astonished: I had listened to the album straight through and there was not a single word on the page. Two things about that surprised me: (1) I always have listening notes, and (2) I rarely these days find myself listening to albums all the way through in one sitting. But then again, I usually review products that have a far more identifiable character, and that gives me lots to write about -- and sometimes reasons to shut off my system before an album plays through.
The only concrete thing I could dig up at the end of that listening session was the one that leapt out at me: how pristine and airy the cymbals sounded on "A Whiter Shade of Pale." This wasnt a coloration, though, but rather a sign of an utterly pure and completely transparent top end. At the time I recalled thinking that the S2's tweeter was one of the best Id ever heard, mostly because it didnt sound like any tweeter at all. (I guess that would make it the best-sounding tweeter that I didnt hear.) The rest, though, was a blur.
The next day I made a conscious effort to take notes -- any notes -- so I had something to write about. This time I played Johnny Cashs American IV: The Man Comes Around [Universal 077083] -- a recording I bought and thought I wouldnt like. (Why did I buy it then? Sometimes just to test myself. Thats how I ended up with a Jessica Simpson disc in my collection, if you must know.) But I did end up liking the Cash disc -- a lot -- and on the S2s it sounds phenomenal, even if the S2s do ably reveal that the recording has its fair share of flaws. And this time, I had notes.
At the beginning of the listening session I made a deliberate effort to listen to the treble on all tracks to determine if the Willie Nelson recording was just an anomaly. It wasnt. The S2s tweeter is magnificent for its clarity, sweetness, and extension. It sounds -- or doesnt sound, whatever way you look at it -- completely effortless. Thats part of the reason I got so lost in the Willie Nelson disc. The Studio 20 v.3s tweeter sounded fantastic -- amazing for the money, even compared to very expensive speakers tweeters -- but the S2s gold-anodized dome is another step up in performance. The S2s tweeter doesnt just rival more expensive tweeters; its performance is so clean and clear that its now the one others have to rival.
Then theres the way the S2 handles the mids, which, as with the highs, sound so transparent its like theres not even a driver there. As a result, voices project almost magically. One new disc Ive grown to like more with each listen is Beautiful: A Tribute to Gordon Lightfoot [Borealis Records BCDNBM500], featuring an all-Canadian cast of musicians, each playing a favorite Lightfoot tune. The music seemed so fitting to play on this all-Canadian speaker that I felt like I should put on a hockey jersey, too, and perhaps kick back a Blue. Surprisingly, not one of the musicians was ambitious enough to take a crack at "The Wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald," but you do have everyone from Cowboy Junkies playing "The Way I Feel" to The Tragically Hip having a go at "Black Day in July."
The Hips track proved that the S2s can rock -- and play Gyproc-cracking loud if you want them to -- but I was most taken with Connie Kaldors "If You Could Read My Mind." With perfect tonal balance, complete freedom from sibilance, and pristine purity, this song showed that the S2s are as adept at female vocal as they are at male. Kaldors voice was thrust center stage with ultra-sharp precision, texture and presence that resembled life, not hi-fi.
The bass range was just as surprising as the mids and highs, not necessarily for its depth but for its impact. In fact, the S2 is so quick-sounding in the bass that it makes you think the speaker is reaching far lower than it really is. As a result, the S2s are pint-sized powerhouses that can sound larger than their small size suggests.
Spec-wise, Paradigm rates the in-room response of both the S2 and the Studio 20 v.3 about the same -- to just under 40Hz. In my smallish room Im probably getting just under 50Hz, solidly, mostly because the room is fairly small and because I tend to pull the speakers far away from the walls, which mostly eliminates the walls' help in reinforcing the bass. Careful listening reveals that both speakers are reaching down to about the same level in my room, but the S2s have much more slam, making them sound quite a bit more authoritative than the Studio 20 v.3s. And that bit of upper-bass boxiness I noticed with the Studio 20 v.3s is completely gone with the S2. In the end, I found that the S2s dont deliver more bass than the 20 v.3s, as in deeper bass, but they do deliver tighter and more articulate bass.
Overall, from the highs to the lows the S2s sound ultra-precise, which helps music played through them sound exciting and real. On "The Man Comes Around," the S2s' "get up and go" makes the guitar sound razor-sharp and immediate, Cashs voice tight and textured, and the piano strong and rich. The S2s also reveal an astonishing level of detail, but do it without sacrificing what many call musicality -- defined usually as ease and a lack of fatigue in the presentation. The S2s prove that musicality and resolution need not be musically exclusive.
Finally, when it comes to soundstaging and imaging, the S2s can stun. My well-worn copy of the soundtrack to the movie The Mission [Virgin Records 86001] -- a beautiful choral-based recording that Ive been listening to for almost 20 years -- had striking image specificity and a glorious sense of space. From front to back and left to right, the S2s can lay out a stage with staggering dimensions. Then theres Ani DiFrancos "Everest" (Up Up Up Up Up Up [Righteous Babe RBR013-D]) -- another one of my staple recordings that I use for imaging tests. DiFrancos voice was placed precisely where it should be -- left in the stage and just back of the speaker plane -- with absolutely no smear, and her voice was not pulled toward the left speaker, as has been the case with other speakers. In my room the S2s disappeared into the music -- perfectly -- turning me away from being a critic and toward being a listener again.
Signature versus Studio, and the Rule of Fives
Ive referred to Paradigm's Studio 20 v.3 speakers a few times in this review, and youve probably gathered that the S2s have it over them in every way. They do, except for one: price. Keeping price in perspective is important when comparing these two speakers because, obviously, not everyone has unlimited money to spend on audio gear.
Last year I began talking about the Rule of Fives as it applies to audio equipment. The number five isnt exact, but it is a ballpark figure that effectively illustrates an important point when shopping for audio products. The Rule of Fives goes like this: For five times the cost of one good product to another good product, you dont get five times the improvement in performance. Instead, you get a fraction of that, oftentimes about one-fifth or less. And even though the Signature S2s retail for two-and-a-half times the price of the Studio 20 v.3s, the same rule applies (some may argue that the Rule of Fives should be renamed the Rule of Two-and-a-Half in this case). The S2s sound so good that I can imagine a smaller company without Paradigms wherewithal trying to design, build, and market them -- for $4000. They'd still be a decent value. There are, after all, companies selling more expensive two-ways at even higher prices that dont look as nice as or offer similar performance to the S2s. Therefore, my Rule of Fives, Ill argue, still holds even in this exceptional circumstance.
Side by side, the 20 v.3s have many similarities to the S2. Theres the familiar Paradigm look -- you just have to see them and youll know what I mean -- and the familiar Paradigm sound: dead-on tonal balance, a wide and stable soundstage, and great frequency extension given the speakers size. Both speakers offer a high level of fidelity. The S2, though, is a significant step up -- significant in terms of price, significant in terms of build quality, and most importantly, significant in terms of sound quality. The S2 essentially takes every aspect of the Studio 20 v.3s performance and makes them marginally better. The bass is tighter, the highs ever so slightly cleaner and sweeter, the mids clearer, and the imaging more precise. There isnt one aspect of the Studio v.3s performance that hasnt been improved at least a little bit with the S2. And while theyre all just a bunch of little differences -- tiny improvements really -- when you combine them, they add up to a listening experience with the S2 thats so much more complete. The Studio 20 v.3s are superb loudspeakers for their price. The Signatures S2s are superb, no caveats needed.
The Signature S2 is one of the best-sounding two-way speakers you can buy, and one of the best-looking as well. With soaring and sweet highs, beautifully articulated mids, and punchy power in the bass, theyre overall as flawless a bookshelf-sized speaker as Ive heard. Perhaps if you value some other sonic characteristics youll differ with me -- some people like their speakers to sound a certain way -- but I think the way that Paradigm has served up the S2 is perfect. And theres more: the S2s may provide all-out performance, but they still come in at a very nice price. Paradigm hasnt abandoned the notion of value thats always been the backbone of the company.
As a result, with Signature Paradigm has managed to do what many thought was impossible: mix state-of-the-art design goals and still maintain high-value pricing. As I stated earlier, at double the price, the S2s would still represent a decent value, and Im sure that if a company without Paradigm's means attempted to create this speaker, $4000 would be the price. But thats not to say youre getting a $4000-per-pair loudspeaker for half-price; rather, the bars been raised. Paradigm has fashioned a state-of-the-art bookshelf classic that is the benchmark by which other minimonitors should be judged -- and costs around $2000 per pair.
If youve dreamed of owning a best-of-its-type loudspeaker but never thought you had the money to do so, times have changed. The Paradigm Signature S2 is for you.
Copyright © 2004 SoundStage!
All Rights Reserved